Dominance Theory: Leave it for the wolves

by Deb Levasseur CTB (Certified Trainer & Canine Behaviour Consultant)

Deb Levasseur and her greyhound, Hughie.

Deb Levasseur and her greyhound, Hughie.

Have you ever thought of your dog’s behaviour as dominant? Ever thought your dog was trying to undermine your authority with its bad behaviour?  Have you watched dog trainers speak about dominance on television and are now more confused than ever? 

To understand dominance theory, it is important to know the meaning of this term. Dominance is defined as “the status in a social group, usually acquired as the result of aggression that involves the tendency to take priority in access to limited resources, such as food, mates, or space.” The problem with dominance theory is that this dog training methodology is based on studies of wolves “Canis lupis”, and dogs are not tame wolves. Dogs are their own species “Canis familiarius”, and are more scavengers in nature than predators. In the wild, dogs live solitary lives as opposed to wolves that live in packs. It is also important to note that feral dogs have never reverted to become wolves. Trying to apply the study of wolf behaviour to dog behaviour is very flawed right from the get go. These studies were mainly on captive wolves that were thrown together inexplicably (not a natural wolf pack consisting of Mom, Dad and the pups). Dr. Ian Dunbar, a well-known veterinarian, animal behaviorist, and dog trainer once said, “Saying ‘I want to interact with my dog better, so I’ll learn from wolves’ makes about as much sense as saying ‘I want to improve my parenting — let’s see how the chimps do it.’” 

As a dog trainer and behaviour therapist, I am surprised to still hear people referring to their dog’s behaviour as dominant. While dominance theory was very popular in the past, most dog trainers now prefer positive training techniques. What I suggest to dog owners is to replace the term dominance with a more descriptive word for their dog’s behaviour. To quote Stephen McKay CPDT-KSA , a fellow dog trainer, “Once you put on those dominance glasses, all behaviours are seen through those filters. It becomes a relationship based upon suspicion that everything the dog does is motivated by a desire to somehow undermine the owner.” 

Even between canines, so-called dominance is very fluid as dogs are never dominant over everything. For example, a generally submissive dog could love toys so much that he takes them from a more assertive dog. Dogs protect what they really care about and only need to control access when the resource is limited. If a household has enough resources for everyone, dogs do not have to compete for them. If some resources, such as food and water, were scarce they would compete to survive and the stronger dogs would win. However, this is an example of the survival of the fittest and has nothing to do with dominance. Some dogs, like people, are more assertive than others. This assertiveness should not be confused with dominance. Dogs are not egotistical, nor do they have the need for power and control. In most cases, describing dog’s behaviour as dominant is not accurate.

Often behaviour problems believed to be the result of dominance are due to lack of proper training. Dog owners can be unrealistic in their expectations of their pets and label them as stubborn, dumb, or dominant when they do not readily comply. Keep in mind; dogs need many repetitions in many different places and situations in order to really know a cue. Dogs do not generalize well. Changing one small factor for a dog, changes everything. Some issues could also be related to stress or fear. For example, the dogs growls at you when you lay beside him on his dog bed; he is not trying to control his bed and be the boss over you, he may actually uncomfortable with you invading his personal space. The dog in this case could get yelled at, which would make him even more afraid of people in his space. Dogs certainly can have issues like guarding food and valuable resources such as the couch and this should be addressed as a guarding issue – not a dominant one. Raising dogs is much like raising children. Good parents do not use pain, fear, or intimidation in raising their children, and owners do not need these techniques to raise their dog. Dogs, like children, need clearly defined rules and boundaries and to understand the consequences of disobedience. Consequences must be fair and enforced consistently. Proper positive training techniques will increase a dog’s confidence, while poor training methods can damage the relationship between dog and owner. If an owner experiences difficulty training their dog, particularly when their pet is displaying aggressive behaviour, I would strongly recommend they seek help from a certified positive dog trainer. 

Keep in mind that science has come a long way from the Monks of New Skete who wrote the book advocating such methods as the alpha roll-over. Even they have re-written much of their theory so why are some people still buying into “alpha roll-overs, scruff shakes, staring the dog down, choking the dog, etc… to show him who is boss?” Going through doorways first or eating before your dog will not show him who is boss and will not promote leadership in your relationship. We have also discovered that when a wolf is seen over top of another wolf, the wolf on the ground rolled onto his back willingly and that packs are managed mostly by submission and not dominance. 

Dog owners need to be calm, assertive, and in charge. Dominance and leadership are two different methods to achieve this control. Dominance is the use of force through aggression to gain priority access to whatever an individual desires. Leadership, on the other hand, is the ability to influence the behaviour of others. A person can be dominant by bullying, or be a leader by providing incentives and rewards. Would you rather be forced or convinced? It’s no different for dogs. 

I believe most owners bring dogs into their lives for the special bond only dogs and humans share. Why risk damaging this unique relationship with dominance theory? Let’s remove our “dominance glasses” and see our dogs for what they truly are – animals that are trying their best to love us and live in our world but need our training and leadership.

Deb Levasseur CTB (Certified Trainer & Canine Behaviour Consultant) is President/Founder of the Maritime Greyhound Adoption Program in NB Canada. mgap.ca

May not be reprinted or distributed in whole or part without permission and proper credit given to author ©

Comments are closed.

Use "ctrl+" or "ctrl-" to increase or decrease text size.

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 3,697 other followers

Posts Calendar

March 2017
S M T W T F S
« Jan    
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

Archives

Blog Stats

  • 879,194 hits
%d bloggers like this: